回到信息流
论文更新 / THE SIGNAL

Are We Really Measuring Forgetting? Pitfalls in Evaluating Machine Unlearning for Multimodal LLMs

来源原文

来源简介

arXiv:2610.19613v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As machine unlearning for multimodal large language models (MLLMs) rapidly advances, rigorous evaluation of its effectiveness becomes increasingly important. However, existing benchmarks largely inherit evaluation protocols from text-only unlearning and overlook the unique challenges of unlearning in multimodal settings. In this work, we identify three major pitfalls that may lead to misleading conclusions: the lack of heldout evaluation to distinguish genuine concept-wise forgetting from instance-wise overfitting, the reliance on synthetic, fine-tuned knowledge rather than real-world knowledge acquired during pre-training, and unfair method comparisons caused by applying the same training settings to different unlearning methods. To address these challenges, we introduce GEMMU (Generalizable Evaluation for Multimodal Machine Unlearning), a benchmark built on real-world knowledge and a principled evaluation protocol. Re-evaluating representative unlearning methods under GEMMU reveals substantial generalization gaps and challenges conclusions drawn from previous benchmarks. Our findings highlight the importance of rigorous evaluation for advancing multimodal machine unlearning and provide guidelines for future benchmark design.

本条尚未生成中文 AI 摘要,以上展示来源提供的原始简介。
采集于 2026/10/20 21:06:31(北京时间)。 arXiv 日期为本次公告时间,论文初次投稿日期请查看原文版本记录。

阅读 arXiv · cs.CL 原文arxiv.org · 在新窗口打开